ARC
The latest on the accelerating Arc of Human Progress.  Seize yours.
Human Progress

Humanity Is Less Violent Than at Any Point in Recorded History. The Data Is Overwhelming.

Ask a random sample of people whether the world is getting more or less violent, and the majority will say more violent. They are wrong. The data is not ambiguous on this point. It is overwhelming.

War deaths, homicide rates, genocide deaths, deaths from political violence, deaths from terrorism, deaths from domestic violence — every major category of lethal human aggression has declined significantly over the past 50 to 75 years, and most have declined to levels that would have seemed utopian to any prior generation.

This is not cherry-picked optimism. This is what the data shows. The disagreement between what people believe and what the data shows is itself one of the most important stories about how human beings perceive risk.

War: From Mass Casualties to Historical Lows

World War II killed an estimated 70 to 85 million people — military and civilian combined. That represented roughly 3% of the entire global population at the time. At the rate of killing in 1944, scaled to today's world population, we would be losing 250 million people per year to war.

Annual battle deaths from interstate conflicts have averaged under 50,000 per year since 2000 (Uppsala Conflict Data Program / Our World in Data). Even accounting for conflicts like Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine — each of which represents a genuine tragedy — the per-capita rate of death from organized war is lower than at any measurable point in the past century.

The post-WWII era saw the construction of international institutions — the United Nations, NATO, the EU, the World Trade Organization — explicitly designed to make war between major powers prohibitively costly. They have worked. No two nuclear powers have fought a direct conventional war. No Western European countries have fought each other since 1945. The longest peace between European great powers in recorded history is the one we are living in.

The conflicts that do exist — civil wars, proxy conflicts, terrorism — are horrific for the people in them. But they kill at a fraction of the rate of 20th-century interstate wars. The trend, on the right time scale, is unmistakably downward.

Homicide: Down in Every Region With Reliable Data

The global homicide rate was approximately 8.8 per 100,000 people in 2000. By 2021, it had fallen to 5.8 per 100,000 — a 34% reduction in 20 years (UNODC World Crime Trends). This decline held across Latin America, Asia, Europe, and North America — the four regions with the most reliable long-term homicide data.

The United States tells a particularly striking story. US violent crime peaked in 1991, at 758 violent crimes per 100,000 people — a number that fueled enormous political and cultural anxiety. By 2022, that rate had fallen to approximately 399 per 100,000 — a 47% decline. The average American in 2022 faced roughly half the risk of violent victimization as the average American in 1991.

This happened while the US prison population expanded significantly in the 1990s and then began a slow decline. It happened through demographic shifts, policing changes, the waning of the crack cocaine epidemic, lead paint remediation, and dozens of other factors that researchers still debate in their relative weight. What is not debated: the crime rate fell sharply, and the average American is substantially safer than their parents were.

Western Europe's rates are even lower and have declined even more sharply. The UK, Germany, France, and the Scandinavian countries all record homicide rates between 0.5 and 1.5 per 100,000 — numbers that represent historical lows and would have been unimaginable for most of European history.

Genocide and Mass Atrocity: A Century of Learning

The 20th century's record on organized mass killing is genuinely horrific: the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, Stalin's purges, Mao's famine-purge combination, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia. Estimates of deaths from 20th-century genocides and political mass murders range from 100 to 200 million people across the century.

The 21st century's record, while not clean — Darfur, Myanmar's Rohingya crisis, ongoing atrocities in Sudan — shows a dramatically lower casualty rate. Deaths from genocide and mass political violence fell to under 100,000 in the 2010s on most estimates — a reduction of more than 99% relative to the worst 20th-century decades, even accounting for population growth.

The mechanisms of improvement include: international criminal accountability (the ICC, UN tribunals), satellite surveillance that makes mass atrocities harder to hide, faster humanitarian response, and the simple fact that the political ideologies — totalitarian communism, European fascism, imperial colonialism — that drove the worst 20th-century mass killings have been largely discredited and dismantled.

Three numbers that define the violence decline
99%+ — Reduction in per-capita battle deaths from interstate war since WWII peak; annual deaths now average under 50,000 vs. millions in 1940s Source: Uppsala Conflict Data Program; Our World in Data / Peace Research Institute Oslo
47% — Decline in US violent crime rate since the 1991 peak: 758 per 100K → 399 per 100K in 2022 Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) / National Crime Victimization Survey, 2023
34% — Reduction in global homicide rate from 2000 to 2021: 8.8 per 100K → 5.8 per 100K, across all regions with reliable data Source: UNODC World Crime Trends, 2023

"The news makes the world feel more dangerous every year. The data makes the opposite case every year. The data wins."

The Media Paradox

If violent crime has fallen 47% since 1991, why does most of the public believe crime has gotten worse? The answer is media economics.

Research by Steven Pinker, John Mueller, and others documents a consistent pattern: violent crime reporting in US media increased by approximately 400% between 1990 and 2000 — the exact decade when violent crime fell sharply. More crime coverage, less crime. The divergence has persisted.

The economic logic is simple: fear drives attention. Danger drives clicks. A murder in a previously safe neighborhood generates more coverage than the statistical reality that murders have been declining for three decades. The availability heuristic — the tendency to judge probability by how easily examples come to mind — means that people who consume daily crime news will systematically overestimate how common violence is.

This is not a conspiracy. It is the natural outcome of media economics combined with human psychology. The coverage isn't wrong — murders do happen, wars do occur, genocides are committed. But the coverage is unrepresentative: it selects for the violent, the frightening, and the dramatic, and omits the broader statistical context that would make the picture accurate.

The result is a population that simultaneously lives in the safest era in human history and believes it lives in one of the most dangerous. This misperception has real consequences for political choices, for policy, for anxiety, and for how people assess the world their children are growing up in.

Why the Improvement Happened

Steven Pinker's Better Angels of Our Nature identifies several forces driving the long-term decline in violence: the rise of effective state governance (Leviathan states that monopolize violence and apply it through law), expanding trade interdependence that makes conflict economically costly, the growth of literacy and perspective-taking through education, and the gradual expansion of what philosophers call "the circle of empathy" — the set of beings whose suffering we consider morally relevant.

All of these forces are real, and all are still operating. Governance is imperfect and in some places deteriorating. Trade can be disrupted. Education varies. Empathy has limits. But the long-term trajectory these forces have produced — measured in actual bodies, in actual murder rates, in actual war deaths — is unmistakably positive.

The Honest Caveat

This article is not an argument that violence is solved. Russia's war on Ukraine — the largest land war in Europe since WWII — is ongoing as of 2024, with hundreds of thousands of deaths. Gang violence in Central America and parts of the Caribbean produces homicide rates that rank among the world's highest. Terrorism remains a threat in multiple regions. The gains are real; the remaining problems are also real.

The accurate framing is not "violence is over." It is: "violence is at a historical low, the trend is downward, and the mechanisms driving that improvement are real and can be strengthened." That is a very different picture from "the world is getting more dangerous" — and it is the picture the data supports.

The feeling that the world is getting more violent is not supported by the data. The data, which is extensive and carefully collected, points in one direction over the right time horizon. And over the long arc, humanity is winning.